The Artemis II mission has been moved back again.
They keep postponing in by thirty days.
The whole thing is surprising: suddenly after donnie showed up again, with Epstein breathing down his neck, what had been an aspirational-only sort of "someday, sometime" project became "we are going in February" sort of mission.
Not surprisingly, "February" has become "later, probably March".
Since "whatever is wrong with things" required transporting the skyscraping rocket back into the barn, "March" is probably early.
Transporting that thing across the ground takes a lot of time.
March is probably about as soon as it's going to be back in the barn.
Unless they want to shoot the thing through the roof - possible since Boeing is in charge - they are going to need to crawl it back out to roof-free Florida to try to launch it.
Sometime.
Probably not March.
"Try" is a scary word to me, at least when it applies to the lives of four brave human beings who are willing to sit on the tip of what is, in the best of all worlds, a bomb, and pray for "liftoff".
"Try" becomes an even more ominously fatal prediction when it is used in relation to the company that, back in 2019, wanted to stay the order from the FAA grounding its deathtrap Max 8 and instead, "collect more data"; two crashes killing everyone on board wasn't enough data; they wanted to see if the Max 8 kept crashing.
So, with Boeing in charge of a big piece of Artemus II, what has been the hold-up?
Artemis II is not failing because of one big flaw.
It’s the accumulation of:
recurring leaks
shifting safety thresholds
communication failures
unexplained anomalies
heat‑shield uncertainty
suit concerns
schedule pressure

No comments:
Post a Comment