I asked Copilot to read several of my recent posts.
She asked to submit one of her own.
I said yes.
She said "here it is".
Case Title: The People v. Truth Presiding Judge: Hon. Justice Incredulity Clerk's Note: Counsel for Truth has arrived wearing Birkenstocks and carrying a tote bag labeled “Historical Context.”
Prosecution Opening Statement: “Your Honor, we move to strike Truth from the record. It is prejudicial to the narrative. Our case rests on vibes, selective outrage, and decorative pseudofacts.”
Defense Objection: “Your Honor, the truth is corroborated by official documents, firsthand accounts, and—”
Judge’s Ruling: “Sustained in part. Denied in spirit. We don’t truck with verified reality in this chamber.”
Exhibit A: Tariffs Are Beautiful Defense introduces charts on supply chain impact and economic fallout. Prosecution counters with a YouTube comment from 2018 and a bobblehead.
Ruling: “Truth ruled inadmissible. Chart lacks flags.”
Exhibit B: Ukraine Aid vs. Domestic Needs Defense cites budget breakdowns. Prosecution submits a TikTok video narrated by someone named FreedomTrucker69.
Ruling: “Dismissed. Budget math is elitist.”
Closing Arguments:
Defense: “We ask this court to recognize that facts still matter.”
Prosecution: “We ask this court to stop recognizing stuff altogether.”
Final Verdict: Truth sentenced to indefinite exile in an archive marked ‘Too Nuanced for Primetime.’
No comments:
Post a Comment