Hearing about the two Air Force planes shot down today got me remembering.
When I remember, lots of times, I read one of my memoirs.
This is a snippet from Saigon 1967.
****************************************************
I had
noticed that Time Magazine (I had my Time subscription delivered to me
in Saigon, albeit a version with very thin paper compared to the domestic
magazine) had much deeper discussions of many of our targets. And Time’s discussion of the conduct and
results of many of the missions with which I was familiar was much more
in-depth, interesting and insightful than the information I could glean from
classified sources. At first this
irritated me. Why were my classified
sources so boring, irrelevant, wrong and, basically, useless? Why couldn’t we do a better job? Why couldn’t we do a competent job of
gathering and disseminating intelligence?
Time magazine could; why couldn’t we?
Then an idea occurred to me. Why not use Time as my source wherever
possible for my briefings? Who would
know? I read the classified stuff. Nobody would know that I was only using the
classified stuff as a fact checker where that was possible against what Time
had to say. Where the facts were absent
and Time had information so much the better.
There was no way to question me.
My briefings, which had been up to that point encounters my
audience bore up under as a professional duty requirement, quickly became
lively well-attended events. I suddenly
gained the reputation of being a young officer on the rise. And, best of all, I was assimilating and
purveying information that was actually interesting enough to keep everybody,
even me, awake and paying attention. But
I had already made the career decision not to let anybody, or anything make me
really care.
That was probably a good thing.
On the strength of my vastly improved briefing skill, I was
chosen to replace a departing lieutenant whose primary function had been to
brief every morning the brigadier general who was commander of the entire 7AF
HQ intelligence function. The subject of these briefings was everything that
had happened overnight. The problem with that, in addition to an aversion I had
toward generals, was that the information available for preparing them was only
our useless, boring, inaccurate classified information. Time magazine was weekly. Its information was a week old, not
overnight. So I was back in the soup.
The difference this time was that the general really
thought he was winning the “war effort” and wanted to know “what” and “why” and
“who” and a bunch of other interrogatives about every subject. That information was either not readily
available or was totally unavailable.
Without Time Magazine I was dead meat.
As a result, my answers very quickly transmitted the impression, which
was fact, that I didn’t give a shit and, in any event the interrogatives were
so trivial as to be ridiculous.
I was quickly replaced with someone who gave a shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment